I thought what I would do, would be to compare and contrast the different types of liposuction, and then explain my technique, and then we’ll go over risks and complications.
Traditional Liposuction
So, traditional liposuction involves using a hollow metal tube that’s connected to a suction machine that creates about two atmospheres of negative pressure to suck fat out of the tissue. So as I just mentioned, the surgeon will put a water solution, what we call tumescent or tumescent fluid, into the fatty tissue.
This is IV fluid that, in my case, has a little bit of numbing medicine just to help with post operative pain, but mostly a small amount of epinephrine. Then this is allowed to remain in contact with the fatty tissue for about 15 minutes to constrict the blood vessels.
In traditional liposuction, the cannula is introduced and fat is sucked out in little tunnels,. We try and not make a contiguous cavity, meaning you just suck out a large valley of fat, because then that area can fill with fluid and will also cause the skin to collapse there, creating an indention or a divot.
So liposuction in all forms is done by creating a honeycomb of little tunnels where the fat is removed. And traditional works just fine and we still use it in many areas of the body.
Ultrasonic Liposuction and its Skin-Tightening Effects
Ultrasonic liposuction became popular in the late 1990s. The ultrasound machine that we all know for looking at veins and looking at babies, had been adapted to create a cannula where ultrasound energy came out of the tip.
And this was used by general surgeons to help remove liver tumors, or tumors from the spleen – areas where there was a lot of bleeding. And the vibratory effects of the ultrasound would essentially emulsify or dissolve the tissue. This was then applied to liposuction.
So in an ultrasonic technique, you would put the tumescent fluid in, then wait your time, and then put in a small ultrasound probe. And ultrasound energy is emitted from the tip and hits the wet fat causing it to emulsify or explode.
In areas of very fibrous fatty tissue, which could be the flank area, the low back area, the outer thighs; for males, the breast area, really revolutionized our ability to remove this fibrous fat that just couldn’t be suctioned out in the traditional way.
The other wonderful side effect, that wasn’t really known at the time but became quite obvious, was that the energy that was delivered into the tissue from the ultrasound waves would create some heat at the bottom of the skin in the lower dermal level, and cause the skin to contract and tighten up.
So not only are you removing fat, but you’re creating tighter skin. This is done through a scarring process, but if you’re careful, it doesn’t create any visible or palpable scar exteriorly.
There were studies done back in those days to compare traditional and ultrasonic. It was quite easy to do that because a person’s body could act as the control.
You could do one thigh on the right side with traditional, and the left thigh with ultrasonic, and then just see which one got a better result: Which one was the skin tighter, which one had more fat tissue left behind. Those studies prompted me to incorporate ultrasonic liposuction into my practice.
The company that makes the ultrasonic machine is named Vaser. So we just call it Vaser liposuction. A lot like you just say Kleenex because of the Kleenex company.
Power-Assisted Liposuction (PAL) – Less Effort, but Inferior Skin-Tightening
There are some newer techniques now, one that’s very popular is PAL liposuction, and that’s just power-assisted liposuction. In that, the cannula tube goes in and, through a machine, it vibrates back and forth to simulate the movement of the surgeon’s hand when we’re pushing the cannula in and out of the fat to suck the fat out.
This doesn’t really remove more fat, it certainly does not create better tightening. It’s just easier for the surgeon because there’s less fatigue of your arm. I can certainly account to the fatigue of your arm when you’re doing a big liposuction. It’s quite a significant physical workout.
The PAL company says there’s no friction or heat created. So, to my mind, if you’re not creating any friction or heat, there’s no reason that you’re going to have better skin tightening with the power-assisted technique.
And I have seen no studies that go head to head with ultrasonic on one side, and the power-assisted on the other to show that power-assisted gives you a better or tighter result than just ultrasonic.
Water-Assisted Liposuction (WAL)
There’s a new machine now which uses a water-assisted removal of the fat. I haven’t seen it, I really haven’t researched it, and I haven’t talked to anybody that uses it on a regular basis.
It would seem to me that putting a lot more water into the fatty tissue to take out – in essence using a jet to emulsify the fatty tissue, would make it very hard to know what your end point would be.
I’m not saying it’s a bad technique, it’s just one that I have no experience with, and have seen very little in the literature to say whether this is just a passing fad or not.